Next Pathway //
May 19, 2020
Next Pathway //
June 25, 2020
Recently named by The Globe and Mail as Canada’s hottest cloud start-up company, Next Pathway automates the end-to-end challenges our customers experience when migrating applications to the cloud
Join the team!
Our work environment rewards people for hard work, loyalty, innovation and mutual support
The days in which a bank manages its
performance using finance-only metrics such as net income are history. In the
modern world of finance, those who fail to consider risk assessment or risk
management as factors fail to optimize their banking.
So, what are risk analytics exactly? The financial meaning of the word doesn’t change much from the way we use it in our everyday lives. Risk goes hand in hand with reward — or the lack thereof. Thus, in modern financial predictive analytics, metrics have been generated to consider both estimated revenue as well as weight and audit financial statements for variables associated with a given investment or purchase.
Now, just as with any technological and data-driven adaptation to the world of business and finance, legacy platforms are a common obstacle. For example, many companies who have taken into account the valuable information derived from risk assessment have this entire process isolated or “siloed” from their financial assessment. This means that each of the models is being trained in isolation, each with its own data set, machine learning and analytics platform, and reporting generators. So, what’s the issue? What is there to gain from transforming the way your data is analyzed from isolated silos to a uniformed risk management approach?
When it comes to big data and analytics in the
field of financial institutions and risk, the underlying cost that is often
overlooked falls under the umbrella costs of IT. Whether your servers are
localized, private, or public clouds, there’s no doubt that, in one way or
another, your company is paying hefty costs depending on how much data you are
collecting and utilizing for financial and risk assessment.
If your company is still utilizing a
non-unified approach to financial reports and risk assessment, I’m willing to
bet you’ve got the same set or sets of data stored in more than one location.
It may not seem like much, but as your company grows, so will the amount of
data that needs to be stored, replicated, and processed in each of these
separate locations. Imagine the cost benefits of only having to store and
process data in a single location and having it available to be pulled and run
through a risk analysis or internal audit. When it comes to a company’s bottom
line, sometimes a bit of investment upfront in data consolidation balances out
with future cost reduction.
When your company decides it’s time to move
toward a uniform platform, there are a few key things to keep in mind during
the transition. The first step is deciding who to appoint as the chief data
officer, the person who has the final say and who takes responsibility for the
whole process, for better or worse. They need to establish baseline processes
and norms to be incorporated into the architecture of the unified platform.
Upon considering regulatory requirements, you must design the platform that
your company will utilize.
The key idea here is that if you’re going to make a change, don’t hold back — do your research and take advantage of newly developed technologies that may not have been accessible in your former system. For example, consider in-memory computing, which allows for the integration of all information in addition to analysis to be processed in memory — hence, ad hoc analytics and calculations can be delivered in real-time. From a technology perspective, it’s never made more sense to move towards a unified platform and realize the benefits of a unified approach to risk assessment and management.
People vector created by freepik – www.freepik.com
Copyright © 2020 Next Pathway Inc. All rights reserved.SHIFT™ is an existing, applied for or registered trademark of Next Pathway Inc.